A Brief History of Life
Back in the early 1990s, British anthropologist Robin Dunbar began studying the social groups of various kinds of primates… Primates tend to maintain social contact with a limited number of individuals within their group.
Dunbar noticed that primates with bigger brains tended to have more friends. He reasoned that the number of individuals a primate could track was limited by brain volume.
Then he plotted brain size versus number of contacts and
… extrapolated to see how many friends a human ought to be able to handle. The number turned out to be about 150. This number appears to have been constant throughout human history—from the size of neolithic villages to military units to 20th century contact books.

But now we have Twitter! And Facebook! Do these modern social networks allow us to break through the biological barrier and physical limitations dictated by Dunbar’s Number?
No.
Not according to this recent research paper Validation of Dunbar’s Number In Twitter Conversations:
…even though modern social networks help us to log all the people with whom we meet and interact, they are unable to overcome the biological and physical constraints that limit stable social relations
The bottom line is this: social networking allows us to vastly increase the number of individual we can connect with. But it does nothing to change our capability to socialise. However hard we try, we cannot maintain close links with more than about 150 buddies.
And if Dunbar is correct, that’s the way it’ll stay until somebody finds a way to increase human brain size.
A picture from my work on 4-21-2011. I helped to organize this Guinness world record event. More than 2,800 people from my company took over a street in South San Francisco, and made a dna helix chain all the way down. Yes, the helix is made entirely of people! This is a helicopter view. Enjoy.
(via worldofhiglet)
Wouldn’t you rather read about this than Gaddafi, Quaddafi, Ghaddafi? Or AWOL Democratic lawmakers and plundered state employee pension funds?
It is a good article, and a nice change of pace. It is from the New York Times so for those interested in Safe For Work and not wanting any of that proverbial “mixed content” it is smooth sailing.
National Geographic: Prehistoric Critters, Geology, Facts, Maps, More
Visit the site! Cool interactive time line, despite using Flash!